Abstract Submission 2019 – Rating

gregor.hammerschmidt

Ratings for this entry

Name: francjan
Comment:

no real abstract

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Francjan
Comment:

no real abstract, can not be accepted this way

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: francjan
Comment:

for me fine as poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: f
Comment:

for me a poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: francjan
Comment:

no data, not a real abstract. hope she will bring more if it will be a poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: francjan
Comment:

doubt whether it should be oral or poster. i guess it is a poster. It is fascinating subject, but can he really give the news well enough. Is there really a result ??

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: francjan
Comment:

oral even when little data. Fascinating.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: francjan
Comment:

no real data, she could do and need to know better, poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: francjan
Comment:

poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: francjan
Comment:

poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: francjan
Comment:

Not that many real figures !! could be more. Probably good enough for oral, but maybe poster. 4 stars is too much

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: francjan
Comment:

Great but also no figures. Doubt again between 3 and 4 stars

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: francjan
Comment:

good enough for oral

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: francjan
Comment:

no data, how a shame. She could do better. Now for me it does not rate more than a poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: francjan
Comment:

done twice ????

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: francjan
Comment:

no data yet

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: francjan
Comment:

meta analysis of 3 papers

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: francjan
Comment:

meta analysis of 2 studies. what is being compared. Treamtnet with GMP versus not really treated before ???

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: francjan
Comment:

Not that much data but still, interesting to learn

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: francjan
Comment:

poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: francjan
Comment:

poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: francjan
Comment:

brought by company, therefore probably not judged or commented on by professional within the field. Probably the news is also in the lecture of Cary already > poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: francjan
Comment:

poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: francjan
Comment:

poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: f
Comment:

poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: francjan
Comment:

pitty that group is not smaller but this type of studies we need

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Anita MacDonald
Comment:

This is not an abstract. Neither a poster or oral presentation

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Anita MacDonald
Comment:

This abstract does not say anything – not oral presentation

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Anita MacDonald
Comment:

Worth oral paper – will provide interesting discussion

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Anita MacDonald
Comment:

Worth discussion as an oral presentation

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Anita MacDonald
Comment:

This is an area that is worthy of discussion. I would like to see this as an oral

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Anita MacDonald
Comment:

Poster only – not sure what this is saying

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Anita MacDonald
Comment:

Oral – only because it will be please the medics but not impressed by the data

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Anita MacDonald
Comment:

Could be considered for oral if we do not make the required numbers

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Anita MacDonald
Comment:

Author requested poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Anita MacDonald
Comment:

Poster – this is in twice

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Anita MacDonald
Comment:

Data limited but important topic. Results a little confusing

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Anita MacDonald
Comment:

This is the third time this has been included

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Anita MacDonald
Comment:

Poster – no data

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Anita MacDonald
Comment:

I think this would provide interesting discussion

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Anita MacDonald
Comment:

No new data and author requested poster only

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Anita MacDonald
Comment:

Author requested poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Anita MacDonald
Comment:

Author as asked for poster but I am sure would present orally if asked.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Anita MacDonald
Comment:

This is the 4th time seen this abstract

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

not an abstract, additionally from the company. Should not be presented

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

not relevant

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

interesting, new study

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

authors ask for a poster, let it be like they want.
I am already looking to read this poster. Will be interesting to compare the British system with our.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

I would like to read all the data carefully as a poster, not as a fast oral presentation.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

oral – interesting and actual subject

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

poster and discussion with the authors

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

poster but more data are needed for the presentation even as a poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

oral, very future-oriented idea, worth to be presented to the audience

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

oral, looks like an invitation for international cooperation, quite a future-oriented study

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

poster, needs more solid data

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

poster as was asked by the authors

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

Oral – it is a problem for many patients so worth to be presented

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

oral, if anything can improve already so nicely developed system in UK – I would like to hear it;)

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

poster, strange

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

poster??? I don’t understand

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

Oral, presentation of absolutely great importance for patients outcome, however, I don’t understand the second sentence of the results. Hope it will be improved.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

oral, important study

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

poster and that’s it

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

oral, important voice for 2nd run of our PKU Guidelines

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

oral, interesting from an every-day practise point of view. Good to know that decreasing Phe may not be helpful in patients having these problems

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

poster, important study – good to have another voice in the discussion about using GMP in the pediatric population

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

4th time – poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

poster, but I agree that if there is a place – could be also oral. An important voice in the discussion

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

they asked for a poster, but I wouldn’t mind to have it as an oral

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

poster as requested

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

company presentation – should not be included

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Maria
Comment:

poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Does not qualify as an abstract, more as a presentation for local patients.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Interesting subject, but does not qualify for an abstract. Would suggest the author to submit a correct abstract on this subject next year.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

New knowledge, relevant subject

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Good as a poster. Relevant subject.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Very relevant, but would recommend poster presentation.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Relevant subject for all involved in PKU care.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

A very relevant subject and useful tool.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Could be of interest to know more about the situation in Belarus, presented as a poster.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Interesting approach, very relevant.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Interesting subject, relevant knowledge

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Nice overview, but need actual data for poster presentation

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Relevant subject for poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Interesting and relevant subject for poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Relevant and interesting subject.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Interesting subject. Could be relevant for oral, but poster also useful (as requested by authors)

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Very relevant subject addressing a practical issue.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

In twice, poster presentation

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Lack of standard for abstract submission, poster presentation if any data to present.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Very interesting and relevant subject. Plenty of issues to discuss.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Very interesting and relevant subject, which brings useful knowledge to the field.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Third time!

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Does not have the required standards for abstract submission, but probably will in October and make a good poster

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Interesting and current relevant subject.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Relevant subject and new area of PKU knowledge

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Relevant subject and good for poster presentation, as requested.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Relevant subject and suitable for poster presentation, as requested.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Relevant subject and suitable for poster, as requested.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Suitable for poster presentation, as requested.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Company presentation – not possible to include according to our standards.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Relevant subject, will make a good poster, as requested by author.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Relevant and important subject for the PKU guideline group. Could make a good discussion and inspire other countries to investigate this also.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Relevant subject, will be suitable as poster presentation, as requested.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Good information and suitable for poster, as requested.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Suitable for poster presentation as requested by author.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Interesting and relevant study. Could be good both as oral or poster.

Rating:

Ratings for this entry

Name: Kirsten
Comment:

Again – poster

Rating: